I have to admit, that I have been struggling quite a bit with Elgin's writing. Especially compared to how much sense Lynch made most of the time. I found our class discussion on Perfect Procedural Epistemology to be particularly interesting, as it at first glance makes reasonable sense. However, I feel like it would be remiss to suggest that the only things that can be classified as truth are those which can be absolutely verified. In that matter, I agree with Elgin. I find it difficult to think that it is possible to find a truth that does not have to be based in concrete fact, however. I will look forward to doing the reading for later this week, to find what Elgin proposes is a more reasonable model.